Homeowner’s petition to paint brick houses in historic neighborhood is denied | News, Sports, Jobs

&#13

OGDEN — A petition to permit brick households in the Central Bench National Historic District to be painted was denied in a 6- vote by the Ogden Organizing Fee past 7 days.

Petitioner Brett Rogers suggests he was unaware of a zoning code adopted in 2011 to maintain the historic nature of the neighborhood when he bought his household in the east-central neighborhood of Ogden.

Rogers obtained a code violation for painting his brick home white following a citizen referred to as the town to complain. Possible injury to the brick for paint removing led Rogers to ask the metropolis for an modification letting brick properties in specific disorders to be painted in the spot.

When the Organizing Fee determined to uphold the restriction, members indicated they are in favor of an modification permitting paint or a obvious seal coat vital to maintain deteriorating brick in exceptional circumstances.

A survey of the east-central local community by setting up staff members observed 25% of the brick homes ended up painted, and they are unsure as to which properties had been painted legally prior to the ordinance arrived to fruition.

Rogers is one of quite a few citizens in the community who has received code violations for painting brick households. According to the Planning Fee, eliminating the paint is the only way to be in compliance if the brick home was painted just after 2011.

The Planning Commission acknowledged the undertaking of identifying which houses have been painted given that 2011 is tough.

Summary Masonry Restoration delivered a quotation to the Planning Fee for paint elimination with a probable value around $10,000. Masonry specialists mentioned particular removing techniques could cause further destruction to eroded brick as very well as the mortar among brick.

Michael Letts with White Mountain Inc. performed a paint removing check on the exterior brick of Rogers’ property on Might 11. Letts presented a prepared statement to the Setting up Fee stating the brick on the property is much too smooth for any sort of chemical or abrasive removal.

In accordance to Letts, the paint is preserving the brick and keeping it together. “Chemically taking away the paint would weaken the brick and seriously destruction the integrity of the dwelling,” he mentioned.

After Rogers pointed out the city’s suggestions below its Holding Ogden Stunning plan, language on the website was altered from “Apply a fresh coat of paint to the exterior of a house or other constructing on a property,” to “Repaint locations in which current paint has deteriorated.”

Supplemental improvements to the city’s internet site consist of building a webpage detailing the east-central community space, the countrywide register designation and what residence house owners can count on with regard to common rules distinctive to the location.

Rogers states he was not offered any facts in closing files from Metro City Title or the preceding house owners indicating the residence was located in a historic district.

While the Preparing Fee sympathizes with Rogers, they say the proprietor is ultimately dependable for familiarizing themselves with the zone they are positioned in and what they can and are not able to do.

&#13 &#13
&#13
&#13

E-newsletter

&#13